VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Gajendra Kumar Mishra v. State of U.P. N and Others

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
6 November 2023
Case no.
CRLR 1635/2001

Judgment

Court No. - 69 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1635 of 2001 Revisionist :- Gajendra Kumar Mishra Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. N And Others Counsel for Revisionist :- L.K.Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.

¶1List revised.

¶2No one appears on behalf of the revisionist to press this revision. Sri Bade Lal Bind, learned counsel for the State is present.

¶3Notice was issued to the opposite party nos. 2, 3 & 4. As per the office report dated 27.10.2023 notice has been served personally on the opposite party no. 4 and through legal heir on opposite party nos. 2 & 3.

¶4Despite service of notice, no one appears on behalf of the opposite parties.

¶5The present revision has been filed before this Court with the prayer to set-aside the judgement & order dated 31.03.2001 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Allahabad (Room No.6) in Criminal Case No. 2488 of 9. (State vs. Ravi Shankar and others), under Sections 323, 504 I.P.C., P.S. Handia, District Allahabad with a prayer for remanding the case for re-trial.

¶6The trial court records have been received.

¶7Perused the records of revision and trial court records.

¶8The impugned order dated 31.03.2001 acquits the respondent nos. 2, 3 & 4 of charges levelled against them under Sections 323, 504 I.P.C.

¶9Perused the said judgement & order. There is irregularity or illegality in the same. The revision is dismissed.

¶10Office to communicate this order to the trial court concerned within two weeks from today. The trial court records be also remitted back. Order Date :- 7.11.2023 AS Rathore (Samit Gopal,J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.