- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 19 November 2023
- Case no.
- BAIL 3690/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 69 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3690 of 2023 Applicant :- Ajamal Hasan Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Shivajee Srivastava,Prateek Tyagi,Ravi Chandra Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Avinash Pandey Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
¶1List revised. No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this bail application despite the fact that there are three learned counsels appearing on behalf of the applicant. Sri Avinash Pandey, learned counsel for the first informant and Sri Triveni Saran Rai, learned counsel for the State are present.
¶2This is a second bail application. The first bail application on behalf of the applicant was rejected by this Court vide order dated
29.4.2022 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.55732 of 2021.
¶3Since there is no representation from the side of the applicant, the present bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution. (Samit Gopal, J.) Order Date :- 20.11.2023 Gaurav Kuls High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.