- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 29 November 2023
- Case no.
- BAIL 7419/2022
Judgment
Court No. - 69 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7419 of 2022 Applicant :- Chandrapal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Lalit Kumar Shukla,Brijesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Bhavya Sahai,Som Veer Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
¶1List revised. No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this bail application despite the fact that there are two learned counsels appearing in the matter. Sri Triveni Saran Rai, learned counsel for the State is present.
¶2Sri Bhavya Sahai and Sri Som Veer, learned counsel for the first informant are also not present despite the matter being taken up in the revised list.
¶3The records show that previously on 20.09.2023, the matter was got adjourned on the request of learned counsel for the applicant. Today despite the matter being taken up in the revised list, there is no representation from the side of the applicant or from the side of the first informant to press this bail application.
¶4The incident is of the year 2020. It is more than three years since then. It appears that learned counsel for the applicant has lost interest in the matter.
¶5In view of the above, the present bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution. Order Date :- 30.11.2023 M. ARIF (Samit Gopal, J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.