United India Insurance Co Ltd v. Smt. Sushila Devi and Others

Court No. - 2 Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 20 of 2005 Appellant :- United India Insurance Co Ltd Respondent :- Smt. Sushila Devi And Others Counsel for Appellant :- Amit Singh,Ajai Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Ramesh Chandra Tiwari,Hitesh Pachori Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. Order on Civil Misc. Delay Condonation Application No.12 of 2023 Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the respondents. The substitution application is filed along with the delay condonation application. The applicant/appellant has shown sufficient cause for the delay in filing the substitution application in the affidavit filed in support of the substitution application. The delay in filing the substitution application is condoned. The delay condonation application is allowed. Order on Civil Misc. Substitution Application No.13

of 2023

Heard learned counsel for the applicant/appellant and learned counsel for the respondents. The present substitution application has been filed by the heirs of respondent no.2-Rajeev Gupta, who has died on 28.07.2022, for substitution of their names in the array of parties. Learned counsel for the respondents states that he has no objection in case the substitution application is allowed. Consequently, the substitution application is allowed. Learned counsel for the applicant is permitted to carry out necessary correction in the array of parties within a week. Order on Civil Misc. Delay Condonation Application No.10 of 2023 Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the respondents. The substitution application is filed along with the delay condonation application. The applicant/appellant has shown sufficient cause for the delay in filing the substitution application in the affidavit filed in support of the substitution application. The delay in filing the substitution application is condoned. The delay condonation application is allowed. Order on Civil Misc. Substitution Application No.11

of 2023

Heard learned counsel for the applicant/appellant and learned counsel for the respondents. The present substitution application has been filed by the heirs of respondent no.1-Sushil Devi, who has died on 14.11.2009, for substitution the word 'since deceased' after the name of respondent no.1 and treat the respondent nos.2 to 4 as heirs of respondent no.1, who are already on record. Learned counsel for the respondents states that he has no objection in case the substitution application is allowed. Consequently, the substitution application is allowed. Learned counsel for the applicant is permitted to carry out necessary correction in the array of parties within a week. Order Date :- 30.10.2023 Sattyarth High Court of Judicature at Allahabad