Smt Sunita v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Order on writ petition

¶1It is argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner that respondent no.5 Niranjan Lal has already died and as such, prayer has been made to grant some time to file substitution application.

¶2As prayed, two weeks' time is granted to file substitution application. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Kumar Pathak, Brajesh Shukla, Rahul Pandey, S.N. Sharma, Satyendra Narayan Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ayush Mishra, C.S.C., Sunil Kumar Misra, Vishal Agarwal Smt Sunita .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)

¶3List in the week commencing 6.4.2026.

¶4In the meantime, learned counsel for newly added respondent No.6 shall also file counter affidavit, if so advised. March 12, 2026 P.P. WRIC No. 53977 of 2015 (Prakash Padia,J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 53977 of 2015 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. Impleadment Application No 16 of 2025 1. Impleadment application has been filed on behalf of Smt. Ritu Singh with the prayer to implead her in the present petition as respondent no.6, supported by an affidavit of Vivek Kumar, pairokar of Smt. Ritu Singh. It is stated in paragraph 3 of the affidavit that land in dispute has already been purchased by Smt. Ritu Singh vide sale deed dated 17.4.2021. Hence she is a necessary party. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. In the facts and circumstances of the case and also in the interest of justice, impleadment application is allowed. 4. Necessary incorporation be in the array of parties be made within ten days.