- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 8 November 2023
- Case no.
- SCCR 24/2021
Judgment
Court No. - 4 Case :- S.C.C. REVISION No. - 24 of 2021 Revisionist :- Brijendra Kishore Opposite Party :- Rajeev Kakkar Counsel for Revisionist :- Rishikesh Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- Harsh Narayan Singh Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. Civil Misc. Withdrawl Application No. 10 of 2023 Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and perused the record. Learned counsel for the revisionist has made a prayer to dismiss the revision as withdrawn. It is argued by the learned counsel for the revisionist that after the orders were passed by the court below, parties have entered into a compromise before the Executing Court, and pursuant to the same, the revisionist has handed over the vacant possession of the shop to the respondent. The grounds shown in the affidavit filed in support of withdrawal application, is sufficient. The withdrawal application is allowed. In view of the aforesaid, the present revision is dismissed as withdrawn. Revision Revision is dismissed. Order Date :- 9.11.2023 T.S. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.