VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Smt. Pooja Pandey v. Pankaj Pandey

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
28 November 2023
Case no.
TACL 466/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 2 Case :- TRANSFER APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 466 of 2023 Applicant :- Smt. Pooja Pandey Opposite Party :- Pankaj Pandey Counsel for Applicant :- Atul Ojha,Madan Ji Pandey Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.

¶1List has been revised. Learned counsel for the applicant is present. However, learned counsel for the opposite party is not present despite service of notice.

¶2Heard learned counsel for the applicant.

¶3The present application has been filed by the applicant-wife seeking transfer of Case No.1450 of 2022 (Pankaj Pandey Vs. Pooja Pandey), under Section 13(1) of Hindu Marriage Act pending in the court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Varanasi to the competent court at Ballia.

¶4It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is residing in her parental house at Ballia whereas opposite party has instituted the divorce petition at Varanasi. It is submitted that financial condition of the applicant is not good and parents of the applicant is not in a position to attend the proceeding along with the applicant at Varanasi. It is further submitted that distance between Ballia to Varanasi is more than 130 kilometres and applicant has no source of income to meet the litigation expenses and other expenses which is to be incurred in travelling from Ballia to Varanasi to contest the case instituted by opposite party at Varanasi on each and every date fixed in the matter. Thus, the submission is that if the case is allowed to be proceeded at Varanasi, applicant would suffer serious prejudice.

¶5The opposite party has neither put in appearance nor filed any counter affidavit. As the averments contained in the affidavit filed in support of the transfer application are unrebutted, therefore, they are being treated to be correct.

¶6It is settled in law that convenience of wife is to be looked into in case of dispute between husband and wife. Therefore, considering the hardship which is being faced by the applicant-wife, it is a fit case where this Court should exercise its power to transfer the case from District Varanasi to Ballia.

¶7In such view of the fact, Case No.1450 of 2022 (Pankaj Pandey Vs. Pooja Pandey), under Section 13(1) of Hindu Marriage Act pending in the court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Varanasi is transferred to the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Ballia.

¶8The Principal Judge, Family Court, Varanasi is directed to remit the record of Case No.1450 of 2022 (Pankaj Pandey Vs. Pooja Pandey), under Section 13(1) of Hindu Marriage Act to the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Ballia for disposal of the same.

¶9The Transfer Application is allowed with no order as to costs. Order Date :- 29.11.2023 R.S. Tiwari High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.