Shahrukh v. State of U.P

Court No. - 69 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 24416 of 2019 Applicant :- Shahrukh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh Shukla,A.C.Srivastava,Sunil Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Pankaj Bharti Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.

¶1List revised.

¶2No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this bail application despite the fact that there are three learned counsels appearing in the matter. Sri Pankaj Bharti, learned counsel for the first informant is also not present. Sri Triveni Sharan Rai, learned counsel for the State is present.

¶3This is third bail application of the applicant.

¶4The status of trial was called for vide order dated 28.10.2023 passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court. As per the office report dated 24.11.2023, report of the trial court has been received stating therein that trial has concluded on 15.04.2022.

¶5Perused the report of the trial court.

¶6In view of the same, the bail application is rendered infructuous.

¶7The present bail application is dismissed as infructuous. Order Date :- 29.11.2023 AS Rathore (Samit Gopal,J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad