Sompal v. State of U.P

Court No. - 69 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 40947 of 2020 Applicant :- Sompal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Manoj Kumar Srivastava,Sanjay Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.

¶1List revised. No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this bail application despite the fact that there are two learned counsels appearing in the matter. Sri Bade Lal Bind, learned counsel for the State is present.

¶2This is second bail application. The first bail application of the applicant was rejected by this Court vide order dated 31.01.2020 passed in Crl. Misc. Bail Application No. 4258 of 2020 (Sompal Vs. State of U.P.).

¶3Today despite the matter being taken up in the revised list, there is no representation from the side of the applicant to press this bail application.

¶4The incident is of the year 2018. It is more than five years since then. It appears that learned counsel for the applicant has lost interest in the matter.

¶5In view of the above, the present bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution. Order Date :- 2.11.2023 M. ARIF (Samit Gopal, J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad