Suresh and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Court No. - 86 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 22859 of 2023 Applicant :- Suresh And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sarvagya Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Madan Singh Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA for the State, Shri Madan Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and perused the record.

¶2Learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that on account of trivial dispute over throwing of garbage outside the shop, there was a sudden quarrel between the parties, in respect of which, criminal case have been registered from both the sides and in the said incident, both the sides were suffered injuries. From the side of opposite party no.2, as many as four persons have suffered injuries and Doctor has noted that all injuries are simple in nature except one injury, which has been noted to be grievous in nature, however, author of the said injury has not been specified.

¶3Learned counsel for the applicants has next submitted that subsequently, with the intervention of respected members of both the family and the society, the parties have amicably and genuinely settled their all disputes and differences and now, they do not have any grievance against each other.

¶4Learned counsel for the applicants has next drawn the attention of the Court to the settlement agreement dated

29.04.2023 drawn between the parties, a copy of which has been annexed as Annexure 20 to this application.

¶5Learned counsel for the applicants has next submitted that in view of the said settlement agreement drawn between the parties and in order to maintain harmonious and cordial relations between them, the entire proceedings be quashed.

¶6Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 has also appeared and has filed affidavit on behalf of opposite party nos.2 to 5 and in para 4 of the said affidavit, the settlement agreement has been acknowledged. Further in para 10, it has been categorically stated that opposite party nos.2 to 5 do not want to further pursue the criminal proceedings against the applicants and they have no objection, if the entire proceedings are quashed.

¶7Learned AGA could not dispute the aforesaid facts.

¶8This Court is not unmindful of the judgements of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the cases of:-

(i). B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another, (2003) 4 SCC 675.

(ii). Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation,

(2008) 9 SCC 677.

(iii). Manoj Sharma Vs. State and others, (2008) 16 SCC

1.

(iv). Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab, (2012) 10 SCC 303.

(v). Narindra Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab,

(2014) 6 SCC 466.

¶9Wherein Hon'ble Apex Court has categorically held that compromise can be made between the parties even in respect of certain cognizable and non-compoundable offences. Reference may also be made to the decision given by this Court in Shaifullah and others Vs. State of U.P. and another [2013 (83) ACC 278], in which, law expounded by Hon'ble Apex Court in the aforesaid cases has been explained in detail.

¶10Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, as noted herein above, and also the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the considered opinion that no useful purpose would be served by prolonging the proceedings of the instant case.

¶11Accordingly, the entire proceedings of Case No. 14145 of 2023, arising out of Case Crime No. 509 of 2022, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 325, 452 IPC, Police Station Bilari, District Moradabad, pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.3, Moradabad, are hereby quashed.

¶12This application under Section 482 CrPC is accordingly allowed. Order Date :- 17.10.2023 Nadim High Court of Judicature at Allahabad