- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 21 November 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 27010/2021
Judgment
Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 27010 of 2021 Petitioner :- Pawnesh And Another Respondent :- Commissioner Gorakhpur Division And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Manav Chaurasia,Pramod Kumar Srivastava Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
¶1Heard Sri Ramesh Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Tarun Gaur, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent nos.1 to 3.
¶2Learned counsel for the petitioners confined his prayer only to the extent that the respondent no.1 may be directed to expedite the disposal of Revision No.00796 of 2021, Computerized Case No.C202105000000796 (Dhirendra Singh Vs. Smt. Radhika Devi and others), under Section 219 of U.P. Revenue Act, 1901 preferred by the petitioners which is still pending to be adjudicated.
¶3Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel showed his agreement to the extent that only a direction may be issued to the respondent no.1 to decide the aforesaid appeal within stipulated time.
¶4Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case as well as if there is no other legal impediment available, the respondent no.1 is hereby directed to consider and decide the Revision No.00796 of 2021, Computerized Case No.C202105000000796 (Dhirendra Singh Vs. Smt. Radhika Devi and others), under Section 219 of U.P. Revenue Act, 1901, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of nine months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him.
¶5With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 22.11.2023 Vivek Kr. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.