Sushila Devi and Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Court No. - 92 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 39391 of 2012 Applicant :- Sushila Devi And Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vikrant Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Subhash Chandra Pandey Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J.

¶1Sri Vikrant Pandey, learned counsel for applicants is preset. None is present on behalf of respondent No.2. Sri Sunil Kumar Kushwaha, is present on behalf of State.

¶2On 22.11.2023, this court has passed the following order :- "1. Heard Sri Ashutosh Ojha, Advocate holding brief on behalf of Sri Vikrant Pandey, learned counsel for the applicants and none is present on behalf of the opposite party no.2. Sri Prem Prakash Tiwari, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.

¶2Learned counsel for the applicants submits that despite notice having been issued and served on opposite party no.2, despite the presence of the learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 no counter affidavit has been filed till date.

¶3Therefore, put up this matter peremptorily on 05.12.2023 in additional cause list.

¶4The matter shall not be treated as tied up or part heard to this Bench."

¶3Today also, learned counsel for applicants seeks an adjournment. Since this matter is more than 10 years old and listed peremptorily today. Therefore, the prayer adjournment is rejected.

¶4In view thereof, the instant application is dismissed. Order Date :- 5.12.2023 Akram High Court of Judicature at Allahabad