VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Surya Prakash and 8 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
6 November 2023
Case no.
A482 17260/2017

Judgment

Court No. - 92 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 17260 of 2017 Applicant :- Surya Prakash And 8 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Muktesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Bhawesh Pratap Singh,Umesh Kumar Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J.

¶1Heard Sri P.K. Vishwakarma, Advocate holding brief of Sri Muktesh Kumar, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Umesh Kumar, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and Sri Prem Prakash Tripathi, learned AGA appearing for the State.

¶2The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking quashing of the summoning order dated

19.04.2017 passed in the Complaint Case No. 2987 of 2016 (Smt. Rama Devi vs. Surya Prakash and others) for an offence under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 406 IPC and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Chilh, District Mirzapur, pending before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate -I, Mirzapur.

¶3Vide order dated 11.01.2023, the instant matter was referred for mediation before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court. As per the report of the Mediation Centre dated

29.03.2023, the parties have settled their dispute amicably with the assistance of the mediators and the parties have already filed an application under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act by mutual consent being Divorce Petition No. 187 of 2023 and the opposite party no.2 has agreed to receive Rs. 3.90 lacs as full and final settlement of her claims against the applicants and out of the said amount of Rs. 3.90 lacs, Rs. 1.85 lacs were handed over to the opposite party no.2 on 29.03.2023 by way of bank draft. In the said agreeement, the parties have agreed to withdraw the proceeding of the caes or get the same quashed through competent Court.

¶4In view of the settlement of the dispute, which was purely a matrimonial dispute, the instant criminal proceedings initiated by the opposite party no.2 against the applicants are liable to be quashed in terms of the said compromise between the parties.

¶5Therefore, the instant application is allowed in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre.

¶6The entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 2987 of 2016 (Smt. Rama Devi vs. Surya Prakash and others), under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 406 IPC and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Chilh, District Mirzapur, are hereby quashed. Order Date :- 7.11.2023 Ashish Pd. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.