- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 12 October 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 27811/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 27811 of 2023 Petitioner :- Jal Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Geetam Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Arjun Prasad Yadav Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State functionaries and Sri Arjun Prasad Yadav, learned counsel for the respondent no. 5 are present. Record reveals that the writ petition has been filed with a prayer to quash recovery citation dated 09.09.2022 issued by respondent no.
¶4Learned counsel appearing for the respondents point out that against the order impugned, statutory remedy of filing an appeal under Section 258(1) of the U.P. Panchayat Raj Rules, 1947 is available. In view of the above as well as the judgements of the Apex Court in United Bank of India Vs. Satyawati Tondon & Others [(2010) 8 SCC 110] (paragraph no. 43), Radha Krishan Industries Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Others [(2021) 6 SCC 771] (paragraph no. 27.5) and Varimadugu Obi Reddy Vs. B. Sreenivasulu & Others [(2023) 2 SCC 168] (paragraph no. 36), the writ petition is dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy. However, in case the petitioner files such appeal within two weeks from today, same may be decided by the authority concerned, condoning the delay, if any, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of next three months, after affording opportunity of hearing to all the parties. Order Date :- 13.10.2023 Pravesh Mishra High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.