- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 28 November 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 32691/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 32691 of 2023 Petitioner :- Nitin Kumar Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satya Prakash Pandey,Piyush Tripathi,Rudra Kant Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. It has been stated by Sri Piyush Tripathi, Advocate that he has filed a Vakalatnama on behalf of the petitioner, but the same is not on the record. Office is directed to trace out the Vakalatnama of Sri Piyush Tripathi, Advocate and place it on the record. Sri Piyush Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not wish to press the petition. He, therefore, prays that the writ petition be dismissed as withdrawn. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection for the dismissal of the writ petition. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. Order Date :- 29.11.2023 vkj High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.