- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 31 October 2023
- Case no.
- SCCR 335/2014
Judgment
Court No. - 4 Case :- S.C.C. REVISION No. - 335 of 2014 Revisionist :- Gomti Shankar Pandey Opposite Party :- Raj Kumar Gupta Counsel for Revisionist :- Manoj Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- A.M. Pandey,Krishna Kant Dwivedi,Rama Pati Tripathi Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. No body is present on behalf of the revisionist, through Sri Rama Pathi Tripathi is present on behalf of the respondent. Sri Rama Pathi Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondents has place before this Court order dated 01.01.2022 passed in Execution Case No.03 of 2014, by which possession was given by court concerned to execute the decree. It is further argued that after the aforesaid order was passed, possession has already been handed over to the landlord, as such present revision has become infructuous. In view of the matter, the present revision has become infructuus and same is liable to be dismissed as infructuus. Since nobody is present on behalf of the revisionist, the revision is dismissed in default. Order Date :- 1.11.2023 T.S. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.