- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 2 November 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 36004/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 82 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 36004 of 2023 Petitioner :- Smt. Urmila And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Mishra,Ashish Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ms. Nand Prabha Shukla,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and perused the material on record.
¶2At the very outset, learned Chief Standing Counsel submitted that an F.I.R. has been lodged in the matter against petitioner No. 2 having Case Crime No. 165 of 2023, under Sections 147, 354, 366, 452, 504 and 506 IPC, P.S. Bisharatganj, District Bareilly at the instance of respondent No. 4, the father of petitioner No. 1.
¶3No objection has been raised by learned counsel for the petitioners to the contention made by counsel for State-respondents.
¶4In view of the above, present petition stands dismissed as being infructuous, however, petitioners are at liberty to seek appropriate remedy before competent court, if available under law. Order Date :- 3.11.2023 Monika High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.