Raghuraj Singh v. Union of India and 10 Others

Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 38571 of 2023 Petitioner :- Raghuraj Singh Respondent :- Union Of India And 10 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Singh,Ranjeet Singh Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,C.S.C.,Malik Juned Ahmad,Raman Saxena,Sanjay Kumar Yadav Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; Sri Devesh Vikram, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents; Sri Raman Saxena, learned counsel for the Union of India; Sri Sumit Kesarwani holding brief of Sri Sanjay Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the respondent no. 11/C.B.I. and Sri Malik Juned Ahmad, learned counsel for the private respondent no. 9 and 10.

¶2The present writ petitioner has been preferred for a mandamus commanding the respondents to decide the representation dated 18.9.2023 for making an enquiry against private respondents with regard to alleged forgery within stipulated period.

¶3After substantial arguments once the Court is inclined to dismiss the writ petition with exemplary cost, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly states that he is not inclined to press the writ petition.

¶4Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. Order Date :- 12.12.2023 A.K.Srivastava High Court of Judicature at Allahabad