Ram Kishun Yadav v. State of U.P. and Another

Court No. - 37 Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 1328 of 2023 Petitioner :- Ram Kishun Yadav Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Murtuza Ali,Imran Ali Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. Shri Imran Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the only prayer made by the petitioner is that the Excise Revision No. 40 (Revi.) of 2022 (Ram Kishun Yadav, District Azamgarh Vs. Excise Commissioner Uttar Pradesh Prayagraj / Additional Excise Commissioner (Administration) Uttar Pradesh, Prayagraj and others) be decided by the Revisional Authority within a stipulated period of time. Learned Standing Counsel does not have any serious objection to the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the revisional authorities are under an obligation of law to decide revisions within a reasonable period of time. In the wake of submissions of the learned counsels interest of justice shall be served by directing the revisional authority to decide the Excise Revision No. 40 (Revi.) of 2022 (Ram Kishun Yadav, District Azamgarh Vs. Excise Commissioner Uttar Pradesh Prayagraj / Additional Excise Commissioner (Administration) Uttar Pradesh, Prayagraj and others) filed by the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. The writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 24.11.2023 Vandit High Court of Judicature at Allahabad