Susheel Kumar v. State of U.P. and Another

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 7989 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri V.P.Tripathi, learned AGA for the State, and perused the material placed on record.

¶2This application under Section 482 BNSS has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 451 of 2025, under Sections 318, 338, 336, 340, 61(2), 3(5) B.N.S. and Section 66D Information Technology Act, Police Station Surajpur, District Gautam Buddha Nagar.

¶3Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. The name of the applicant was disclosed by co-accused Chanpreet Singh, Ranveer, Jagmohan Dhakar, Naveen and Aditya Sharma, who were apprehended at the spot. The said statements, insofar as they implicate the applicant, are unreliable. At this stage, there is no credible evidence to link the applicant with the offence. The co-accused, who were apprehended at the spot have been granted bail by the Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 6, Gautam Buddha Nagar vide order dated 30.08.2025 passed in Bail Application Nos. 3665 of 2025, 3664 of 2025, 3607 of 2025, 3608 of 2025, 3663 of 2025 respectively. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. It is next submitted that the investigation is pending and the applicant has apprehension of his arrest in the above mentioned case.

¶4Learned AGA opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manish Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Susheel Kumar .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)

¶5Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that the application for grant of anticipatory bail be confined only till the submission of police report.

¶6Having regard to the submissions made, considering the nature of accusations and antecedents of the applicant, in particular the fact, that the name of the applicant was disclosed by co-accused Chanpreet Singh, Ranveer, Jagmohan Dhakar, Naveen and Aditya Sharma, who were apprehended at the spot; the co-accused, who were apprehended at the spot have been granted bail by the Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 6, Gautam Buddha Nagar; at this stage, there is no substantive evidence to link the applicant with the offence; without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled for anticipatory bail till the submission of police report.

¶7In the event of arrest, the applicant-Susheel Kumar be released on anticipatory bail in the aforesaid case crime till the submission of police report, if any, under Section 193 (3) BNSS, on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/-with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station concerned with the following conditions:-

(i) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

(ii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

(iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if he has passport, the same shall be deposited by him before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned.

¶8In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicant.

¶9The Investigating Officer is directed to conclude the investigation of the present case in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period NABAIL No. 7989 of 2025 of three months from the date of production of a copy of this order independently without being prejudiced by any observation made by this Court while considering and deciding the present anticipatory bail application of the applicant.

¶10The applicant is directed to produce a copy of this order before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned within ten days from today, who shall ensure the compliance of present order.

¶11The application stands disposed of. September 26, 2025 Lbm/- NABAIL No. 7989 of 2025 (Vivek Varma,J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad