- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 28 November 2023
- Bench
- Shree Prakash Singh
- Case no.
- WRIB 100/2006
Judgment
Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 100 of 2006 Petitioner :- Satya Narain Respondent :- D.D.C. Gonda And 4 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Kapil Muni Dubey,Alka Verma,K.K.Singh,Mohit Kumar,Najam Zafar,Tasodduq Husain Khan,Zafar Yab Jilani Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C,Ambrish Tripathi,Sarvesh Kumar Verma,Shyam Mohan,Shyam Mohan Pradhan Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J. Case called out. None is present for the petitioner, whereas, Sri Sarvesh Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 5 is present. From perusal of the record, it transpires that an application was moved by the counsel for the petitioner on 19.01.2023 with a prayer to allow the petitioners to withdraw the writ petition. In paragraph 3 of the affidavit filed in support of the application for withdrawal is evident that the parties have entered into some compromise outside the Court, which is a reason to withdraw the petition. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that now there is no dispute in between the parties as the parties have entered into a compromise deed outside the court. He also submits that he has knowledge that an application has been moved by the petitioner for withdrawal of the writ petition. The counsel for the State has no objection to the contention aforesaid. Considering the submission made in paragraph 4 as well as the prayer thereof in the application for withdrawal, the instant application is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Consigned to record. Order Date :- 28.11.2023 Anurag High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.