- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 19 October 2023
- Bench
- Alok Mathur
- Case no.
- WRIA 1000094/2009
Judgment
Court No. - 17 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1000094 of 2009 Petitioner :- Smt. Bimla Devi Mehrotra Respondent :- Additional District Judge Lucknow Counsel for Petitioner :- R.K.Sharma,R.K.Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pritish Kumar Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. The matter pertains to year 2009. As per office report dated 6.12.2022, on account of incomplete address, the petitioner could not be served card notice. It has been apprised to the Court that the learned counsel for the petitioner himself has expired. Considering the fact that the counsel for the petitioner himself has expired during pendency of the petition and no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending as no better address can be provided. In light of the above, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. (Alok Mathur,J.) Order Date :- 19.10.2023 Shravan High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.