VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ram Kewal Morya v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko and 12 Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
12 October 2023
Bench
Alok Mathurauthor
Case no.
818/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 17 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 818 of 2023 Petitioner :- Ram Kewal Morya Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko And 12 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashutosh Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondent No. 1 to

4.

¶2In light of the proposed order, notices to private respondents are dispensed with.

¶3By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has sought a direction to respondent Nos. 2 to 4 to remove the illegal encroachment of private respondents over the chak marg situated at Gata no.2051 in village – Shivgarh, Pargana – Chanda, Tehsil – Lambhua, District – Sultanpur.

¶4It has been submitted that Gata No.2051 having area 0.0240 hectare is recorded as Chak Marg land in revenue records of village – Shivgarh, Pargana – Chanda, Tehsil – Lambhua, District – Sultanpur and the same is used by the villagers for their passage to their fields and for several other purposes such as transportation and private respondents have illegally encroached over some area of Gata No.2051 by making construction over some area of aforesaid gaon sabha land and now they are claiming Gata No.2051 Gaon Sabha Land to be their ancestral property and they are adamant to make constructions over the land. It has also been stated that petitioner has made complaints in this regard to the competent authority but no action has been taken by them consequently present writ petition has been filed .

¶5Learned Standing Counsel on the basis of instructions has submitted that with regard to encroachment over various rakbas related to Gata No. 251 proceedings under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 have already been initiated and case No. T202204680303693 (Gaon Sabha Vs. Lal Chandra), case No. T202204680303694 (Gaon Sabha vs. Anuj), case No. T202204680303695 (Gaon Sabha vs. Vijay Kumar) and case No. T202204680303696 (Gaon Sabha vs. Anmol), Case No. T202204680303697 (Gaon Sabha vs.Om Prakash) Case No. T202204680303698 (Gaon Sabha vs. Sunil Kumar) and case no. T202204680303699 (Gaon Sabha vs. Rahul) are pending before the competent authority and only after orders are passed, necessary action will be taken against the encroachers.

¶6In light of the above, considering the fact that proceedings in accordance with law, i.e. U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 have already been initiated for eviction against the unauthorised occupants, no further directions are required by this Court in exercise of powers under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

¶7However, the competent authority is directed to expedite the hearing in the aforesaid cases and pass necessary orders expeditiously.

¶8With the above observations / directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 12.10.2023 mks (Alok Mathur, J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.