VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Atul Kumar Singh v. State of U.P. Thru.Prin.Secy. Home and Another

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
18 October 2023
Bench
Shree Prakash Singhauthor
Case no.
10264/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 28 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10264 of 2023 Applicant :- Atul Kumar Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru.Prin.Secy. Home And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sandeep Kumar Yadav,Abhay Pratap Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.

¶1Heard Sri Sandeep Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Nirmal Kumar Pandey, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶2The instant application has been filed with following reliefs:- a. Quash the proceedings of proceedings of Case Crime No.396/2023 (Case No. 17525/2023) U/s-376 I.P.C., pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barabanki, PS-Kotwali Nagar, District – Barabanki. b. Quash/set-aside the impugned summoning Order dated 22.07.2023, passed by the Ld. Chief Judicial Magistrate Ct. No. 18, Barabanki, in Case Crime No.396/2023 (Case No. 17525/2023); State Vs Atul Kumar Singh, whereby the accused applicant has been summoned to face trial in the said Case Crime Number under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. c. Any other and further relief which the Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be granted.

¶3Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that there is no evidence at all against the applicant and the whole proceeding has been initiated and chargesheet has been filed. He added that the criminal proceedings against the present applicant is nothing but harassment.

¶4On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the State has opposed the contention aforesaid and submits that there is no abuse of process of law and only factual matrix has been agitated before this before this Court and that could not be gone into at this stage, invoking the jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and thus the application is liable to be dismissed.

¶5After the argument at length, learned counsel for the applicant submits that interest of justice would be sub-served, if this Court directs the court below to permit the applicant to appear before the court below and file an application of discharge. He further submits that the court below may be directed to decide the discharge application within stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this Court.

¶6Learned AGA for the State has no objection to the aforesaid submission.

¶7In view of aforesaid, the applicant is permitted to file an application for discharge before the court below within a period of two weeks from today and if such an application is filed, the same shall be decided within a further period of 30 days, strictly in accordance with law.

¶8With the aforesaid observation, the application is disposed of. Order Date :- 18.10.2023 Mayank High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.