- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 27 October 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 9220/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9220 of 2023 Petitioner :- Karuna Shankar @ Karuna Shankar Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue U.P. Govt. Civil Secrt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Avinash Chandra Pandey,Vijay Bahadur Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Manish Jauhari Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. The petitioner has approached this Court challenging the recovery certificate dated 25.09.2023 issued on the basis of the electricity bill. The petitioner has disputed the correctness of the same. Shri Manish Johari, learned counsel for the respondent-department states that the petitioner has an alternative remedy to place the dispute in regard to the correctness of the electricity bill under the provisions of clause 6.5 of the Electricity Code, 2005 before the Executive Engineer concerned respondent No.4. In the given circumstances, it is provided that if the petitioner raises such a dispute before the Executive Engineer respondent No.4 within 10 days from today, the Executive Engineer concerned shall decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order within two weeks. Recovery certificate issued against the petitioner shall be subject to the final order passed by the Executive Engineer. In case, the petitioner does not file objection within the aforesaid period of 10 days, the petitioner shall not be entitled for the benefit of this order. With the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of. (Manish Kumar,J.) (Vivek Chaudhary,J.) Order Date :- 27.10.2023 Ashutosh Pandey High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.