VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Jagat Pal Mishra v. State of U.P. Thru.Prin.Secy. Home and Another

Dismissed on merits/Rejected
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
1 November 2023
Bench
Rajeev Singhauthor
Case no.
10667/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10667 of 2023 Applicant :- Jagat Pal Mishra Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru.Prin.Secy. Home And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Bhanu Pratap Mishra,Shivangi Kapoor Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶2Present application has been moved by the applicant for quashing the charge sheet dated 23.09.2020 in case crime no.355/2020 under Section 304 I.P.C. and 3(2)(V) of SC/ST Act, P.S. Purakalander, District-Ayodhya as well as entire proceedings of S.T. No.221 of 2020 pending before Special Judge SC/ST Act, Faizabad (Ayodhya).

¶3Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the charge-sheet was filed by the Investigating Officer in the most mechanical manner as no evidence related to the offence under Section 3(2)(V) of SC/ST Act as well as Section 304 of I.P.C. was found by the Investigating Officer. He further submitted that discharge application was also moved by the applicant but the same was rejected by the trial court vide order dated

02.01.2021 without considering the submissions of the applicant and the said order is under challenge under Section 14(A)(2) of SC/ST Act in Criminal Appeal No.95/2021 and during the pendency of the aforesaid appeal, the charges were framed.

¶4Learned counsel for the applicant relied on the decision of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Hitesh Verma Vs. State of Uttarakhand and Anr. in Criminal Appeal No.707 of 2020 and submitted that this Court has inherent power to examine the evidences collected by the Investigating Officer during the course of investigation, therefore, kind indulgence of this Court is necessary.

¶5Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer of applicant and submitted that as the discharge application of applicant was rejected by the trial court on 02.01.2021, against the aforesaid order, appeal under Section 14A of SC/ST Act No.95/2021 was filed which is pending, and thereafter, charges have been framed. He further submitted that at this stage, the charge sheet cannot be challenged, therefore, application is liable to be dismissed.

¶6Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, going through the contents of application, as well as other relevant documents, as the discharge application of applicant was rejected by the trial court on 02.01.2021 against the aforesaid order, appeal under Section 14A of SC/ST Act No.95/2021 was filed which is pending, and thereafter, charges have been framed, as charge sheet cannot be challenged at this stage, therefore, I am of the view that the present application is liable to be dismissed.

¶7Accordingly, the application is hereby dismissed.

¶8However, it is open to the applicant to move application for expedite the disposal of the aforesaid Criminal Appeal No.95/2021. Order Date :- 1.11.2023 V. Sinha High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.