VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ram Chandra Lodh and Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home, Lko. and Another

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
6 November 2023
Bench
Karunesh Singh Pawarauthor
Case no.
10894/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 13 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10894 of 2023 Applicant :- Ram Chandra Lodh And Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home, Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Manoj Kumar Dixit,Badrus Sahar,Neeraj Kumar Jaiswal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record. The present application has been filed for quashing the charge-sheet no.1 of 2023 dated

25.5.2023 arising out of Case Crime No.0037 of 2023 under Section 147, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3(1)(Da)/3(1)(Dha) & 392)(va) of SC/ST Act, Police Station Rahimabad, District Lucknow. After arguing some time learned counsel for the applicants submits that he does not want to press the application and seeks liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC

¶51Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants. On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties', it is provided that in case, the applicants appear before the trial court within two weeks from today and file bail application, the same shall be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). The application is disposed of accordingly. Order Date :- 6.11.2023 Madhu High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.