VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Smt. Neelam Gupta v. State of U.P. Thru. Nayab Tehsildar Auras, Tehsil-Hasanganj, Unnao and Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
29 November 2023
Bench
Shree Prakash Singhauthor
Case no.
6002/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 18 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6002 of 2023 Petitioner :- Smt. Neelam Gupta Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Nayab Tehsildar Auras, Tehsil-Hasanganj, Unnao And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shiv Shankar Mishra,Amar Nath Dixit,Yagyadatta Pathak Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.

¶1Heard Sri Shiv Shankar Mishra, learned counsel for the the petitioner, Sri Hemant Pandey, learned standing counsel for the State and perused the record.

¶2The instant petition has been filed with the following relief:-

(i) Direct the Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil District Hasanganj, Unnao to decide Case no. 2764/2017 (Smt. Neelam & others Vs Raju) under section 34 of U. P. Revenue Code, 2006 preferred by the petitioner before him in the year of 2017 as soon as possible with speculated period in the interest of justice.

(ii) Any other order or direction which this Hon'ble court may deem fit, just and proper may also be passed in the interest of justice.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the matter is pending consideration and the same has still not been decided. He added that the interest of justice would sub-serve if this Hon'ble Court would be pleased to direct Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil District Hasanganj to decide the Case no. 2764 of 2017 (Smt. Neelam & others Vs Raju) under section 34 of U. P. Revenue Code, 2006, within a stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court.

¶4The learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the contention aforesaid.

¶5In view of the aforesaid innocuous prayer, the Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil District Hasanganj to decide the Case no. 2764 of 2017 (Smt. Neelam & others Vs Raju) under section 34 of U. P. Revenue Code, 2006, within a period of three months, from the date of certified copy is produced before it, in accordance with law, after affording opportunity of hearing to all the parties, if there is no legal impediment.

¶6The aforesaid order is subject to cooperation of the petitioner.

¶7Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 29.11.2023 Mayank High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.