VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Qamar Abbas v. Addl. Commissioner (Judicial)-I, Lucknow Division, Lucknow and Others

DISMISSED AS NOT PRESSED
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
4 December 2023
Bench
Rajnish Kumarauthor
Case no.
1072/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 1072 of 2023 Petitioner :- Qamar Abbas Respondent :- Addl. Commissioner (Judicial)-I, Lucknow Division, Lucknow And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rohit Tripathi,Nida Navi,Shishir Srivastava,Syed Zulfiqar Husain Naqvi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey,Jaibind Singh Rathour Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J. Office has raised an objection that the provision/ group mismatch with memo which is to be clarified because this writ petition has been filed under Article 226 read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India. A note was made by learned counsel for the petitioner that the writ petition is maintainable under Article 226 as well as 227. However, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly concedes that the writ petition can be filed only under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and he submits that this petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file fresh. To which there is no objection by the learned Standing Counsel, Shri Dilip Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha and Shri Jaibind Singh Rathour, learned counsel for the respondent no.3. Dismissed accordingly as not pressed with liberty as aforesaid. As prayed by learned counsel for the petitioner, the office is directed to return the certified copies annexed with this petition to the learned counsel for the petitioner in accordance with law after keeping photocopy on record. ...................................................................(Rajnish Kumar, J.) Order Date :- 4.12.2023 Haseen U. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.