Smt. Neelam v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lucknow and Others

Court No. - 18 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6130 of 2023 Petitioner :- Smt. Neelam Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lucknow And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arun Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.

¶1Heard Sri Arun Kumar Mishra learned counsel for the the petitioner, Sri Hemant Pandey, learned standing counsel for the State and perused the record.

¶2The instant petition has been filed with following reliefs:- a. issue an order or direction in the appropriate nature commanding the opposite party no.2 to decide the leading Case No.2510 of 2021 (Computerized Case No. T-202108620202510); Neelam Devi Versus Ram Gopal, under section 35 of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, connected with No.2513 of 2021 (Computerized Case No. T-202108620202513); Neelam Devi Versus Ram Gopal, under section 35 of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, Case No.2518 of 2021 (Computerized Case No. T-202108620202518); Neelam Devi Versus Ram Gopal, under section 35 of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, Case No.2525 of 2021 (Computerized Case No. T-202108620202525); Neelam Devi Versus Ram Gopal, under section 35 of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 and Case No.2528 of 2021 (Computerized Case No. T-202108620202528); Neelam Devi Versus Ram Gopal, under section 35 of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months. b. issue any other suitable order or direction which this Hon'ble court may deem, fit, just and proper under the circumstances of the case in favour of the petitioner. c. allow the instant petition of the petitioner with costs.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the matter is pending consideration and the same has still not been decided. He added that the interest of justice would sub-serve if this Hon'ble Court would be pleased to direct the opposite party no. 2 to decide the leading Case No.2510 of 2021 (Computerized Case No. T-202108620202510) within a stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court.

¶4The learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the contention aforesaid.

¶5In view of the aforesaid innocuous prayer, the Tehsildar, Tehsil-Ikauna, District-Shrawasti is hereby directed to decide the leading Case No.2510 of 2021 (Computerized Case No. T-202108620202510); Neelam Devi Versus Ram Gopal, under section 35 of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, connected with No.2513 of 2021 (Computerized Case No. T-202108620202513); Neelam Devi Versus Ram Gopal, under section 35 of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, Case No.2518 of 2021 (Computerized Case No. T-202108620202518); Neelam Devi Versus Ram Gopal, under section 35 of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, Case No.2525 of 2021 (Computerized Case No. T-202108620202525); Neelam Devi Versus Ram Gopal, under section 35 of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 and Case No.2528 of 2021 (Computerized Case No. T-202108620202528); Neelam Devi Versus Ram Gopal, under section 35 of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, within a period of three months, from the date of certified copy is produced before it, in accordance with law, after affording opportunity of hearing to all the parties, if there is no legal impediment.

¶6The aforesaid order is subject to cooperation of the petitioner.

¶7Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 7.12.2023 Mayank High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench