VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2024 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Vikas Kumar Dwivedi and 2 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and Another

Dismissed on merits/Rejected
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
18 December 2024
Bench
Rajeev Singhauthor
Case no.
A482 11461/2024

Follow Allahabad High CourtFollow Rajeev Singh

Judgment

Court No. - 13 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11461 of 2024 Applicant :- Vikas Kumar Dwivedi And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And Another Counsel for Applicant :- O.P. Tiwari,Ashish Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.

¶2The present application has been filed with the prayer to quash the impugned summoning order dated 15.10.2024 passed by Learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) Fast Track Court, (Crime Against Women), District - Unnao in Case No. 1366 of 2024, State Versus Vikas Dwivedi and Others as well as charge sheet dated 06.08.2024 arising out of F.I.R./Case Crime No. 0024 of 2024, Under Sections-498A, 323, 506 I.P.C. & 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station-Mahila Thana, District-Unnao.

¶3Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that the private respondent is legally wedded wife of applicant no.1 and she left the house of applicant no.1 on her own taking away several articles with her, thereafter, due to fear of criminal prosecution, she lodged FIR of case in question. He further submitted that one application U/S 156(3) CrPC has been moved by the applicant which is pending, therefore, kind indulgence of this Court is necessary.

¶4Learned AGA has vehemently opposed the prayer of applicants and submitted that after detailed investigation, charge sheet has been submitted. He also relied on the decision of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of CBI Vs. Aryan Singh reported in 2023 SCC OnLine SC 379 and submitted that neither the evidences collected by the Investigating Officer can be evaluated nor the defence of applicant can be considered at this stage, therefore, the present application is liable to be dismissed.

¶5Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, going through the contents of application, judgment relied upon by the learned AGA as well as other relevant documents, it is evident that the evidences collected by the Investigating Officer cannot be evaluated at this stage, therefore, the present application is misconceived and liable to be dismissed.

¶6Accordingly, the present application is hereby dismissed. Order Date :- 18.12.2024 V. Sinha High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.