- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 21 December 2023
- Bench
- Subhash Vidyarthi
- Case no.
- 15193/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15193 of 2023 Applicant :- Om Prakash Verma Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Home), Lucknow Counsel for Applicant :- Ajeet Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
¶1Heard Sri Ajeet Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, the learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records.
¶2The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 345 of 2022, under Sections 34, 406, 419, 420 I.P.C., registered at Police Station Masauli, District Barabanki.
¶3The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 02.07.2022 against two persons, including the applicant, stating that the informant had made some investments in a company but returns were not paid to him. Through the FIR, the informant has prayed for payment of Rs.3.62 Lakh to him. The applicant has been implicated in the present case only being the husband of the directors of the company.
¶4In the affidavit filed in support of bail application it has been stated that the applicant is innocent, he has been falsely implicated in the present case. Applicant's involvement in 51 cases of similar nature has been disclosed in para 2 of the supplementary affidavit, in five of which, the applicant has been granted bail.
¶5A supplementary affidavit has been field on behalf of the applicant stating that the statement of P.W.-1 is being recorded and till date even statement of single witness could not be concluded.
¶6The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but he could not dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter.
¶7Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the informant has prayed for refund of his money through the FIR, which is a relief of civil nature; that the applicant has already been granted bail in 33 other cases of similar nature and yet he is languishing in jail since 26.06.2023 and without making any observation, which may affect the merits of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime.
¶8Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed.
¶9Let the applicant-Om Prakash Verma be released on bail in aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-
(i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;
(ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses;
(iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. (Subhash Vidyarthi, J.) Order Date :- 21.12.2023 prateek High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.