- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 22 December 2023
- Bench
- Rajnish Kumar
- Case no.
- 6529/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6529 of 2023 Petitioner :- Chandra Bhan Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. The Distt. Magistrate Collector, Barabanki Nd 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Durgendra Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh,Uday Veer Singh Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J. On an objection raised by Dr. Udai Veer Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no.4 and learned Standing Counsel that the petitioner has still not been substituted in place of the applicant in Misc. Case No.26 of 2010, therefore this petition for a direction for disposal of the application under Order-39, Rule 2-A of C.P.C. is not maintainable, Shri Durgendra Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file fresh after disposal of the application under Order-39, Rule 2-A of C.P.C. To which there is no objection by the other side. In view of above, this petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as aforesaid. ...................................................................(Rajnish Kumar, J.) Order Date :- 22.12.2023 Haseen U. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.