Maya v. State & Ors

ORDER % 31,.10.2011 The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner's son Jeevan Kumar is present in court. The petitioner is also present in court and she has stated that her son Jeevan is now residing with her. In view of the foregoing, no further directions are necessary in this ' writ petition. The same stands disposed of' rt tu. BADAR DURREZ AHMED,J t/l/tt-'ar-l VEENA BrRBatJ-ocToBER 3t,201.l srb Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

\ ; $-s * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + w.P.(cRL) 8/2011 MAYA ""' Petitioner Through Mr Lalit Sehgal for Mr G.S. Bhatia, Advocate for petitioner. VCTSUS STATE & ORS ""' ResPondent Through Mr Pawan Sharma, St. Counsel' CO.RAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL