Dharambir Singh v. Union of India & Ors`

ORDER %

08.07.2011 For orders, see LA.APP.No. 784/2005.

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J. JULY 08, 2011 . mm Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. •; i1ç : 2 Phe present decision concerns issue of fbation of fr : market value of Iard in the reenue estate of Village Bakkarw ' and vil'age Mundka 3 The dates on which fair market value of the land ha L , to be determined may be graphically noted as urider - S No Name of Village Date of notification under Section4oftheLAAct 1 Bakkarwala 24 9 2003 2 Bakkarwala 17 6 2005 r ?3 Mundka 25 2 197 4 Mundka 21 3 2003 t 5 Mundka 17 6 2005 ' 4 It may be highlighted that the notification at serial No 2 hereinabove, pertaining tO village Bakkarwala, is th sam : pursuant whereto lands were acquired in the revenue estate of Village Mundka, as per serial No 5 above 5 Abutting NH-lU, leading from the city of Delhi to the towhship of Rohtak in th State of Haryana, are villages Muidka, Ghevra and Tikri Kalan Village Bakkarwala lies towards ,the p . other, side of the Southern boundary of vilIge Mundka The' difference between the topology of the two vililagés is, whereas the land of village Mundka abuts NH-b, that of viIIäge J. Bakkarwala does not so abut, being on the other ide'othe' Southern boundary of revenue estate of villge Mundka 6 Aswe proceed from th city of Delhi to the township of Rohtak, village Mundka is crossed first, followed by village Gjievra and then village Tikri Kalan 7 Agricultural lands invillage Mudk were acquired LA4PP784/2005&connected PageSof19

¶4No.193/2006 Pratap Sinqh (Deceased) Thi LRs Vs. VOl as pr 1 which fair market value of land, pérbigha, was determined in 1 the re'sIenue estate of village TiJri Kalã'n as of 16.11.1995, 11 6 1996 and 17 12 2002 at 2,15,l64/- for category A land LA.APP.784(2OO5 & connected S S PagelO of 19 - r i , t

$-3O * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LA.APP.186/2010 DHARAMBIR SINGH Appellant Through: Mr.L.B.Rai, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA& ORS. Respondents Through: Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate for R-1 Mr.Sumer Sethi, Advocate for DDA • CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NAN DRAJOG