- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 19 November 2024
- Bench
- Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora
- Case no.
- CS(OS) 75/2023
Judgment
O R D E R %
19.11.2024
CS(OS) 75/2023 and I.A. 40689/2024 (under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC)
¶1This is a joint application under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for taking on record the settlement agreement dated 29.07.2024 executed between the parties and to decree the suit in terms of the said agreement.
¶2It is stated in the application that the suit property has been partitioned by metes and bounds between the parties and the respective demarcated The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. share of each of the parties is as under: Party Portion in the site plan Measurement Description Plaintiff No. 1, Plaintiff No. 2, Defendant No. 2, Defendant No. 3, Defendant No. 4, Defendant No. 5 Red Colour 454 Sq. Yds North: Green Portion, South: Yellow Portion East: Private Lane, West:Main Phoota Road Defendant no. 1 Yellow Colour 454 Sq. Yds North: Red Portion, South : Property bearing no. 4926, East: Private Lane, West:Main Phoota Road Defendant no. 10 Green Colour 454 Sq. Yds North: Property bearing No. 4922, South: Red Portion of the suit property, East: Private Lane, West:Main Phoota Road
¶3It is stated that the application is duly supported with the affidavits of the parties to the settlement agreement.
¶4The parties are present and are identified by the respective lawyers.
¶5The plaintiff no. 1 is present in Court and states that he also holds the power of attorney on behalf of plaintiff no. 2, defendant nos. 2, 3, 4 and 5.
¶6Defendant no. 1 is represented through his Power of Attorney, Mr. Rashid Manzoor.
¶7Defendant no. 10 i.e., M/s M.U. Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. is represented through its Director, Mr. Faisal Meharban. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
¶8The parties as well confirm execution of the settlement agreement dated 29.07.2024 and filing of the present application.
¶9The parties' state that the partition of the suit property by metes and bounds is duly recorded in the settlement agreement dated 29.07.2024 and reflected in the colour site plan annexed with the said settlement agreement as Annexure F.
¶10This Court has perused the terms of the settlement agreement dated
29.07.2024 and is satisfied that the same is lawful. Accordingly, the present application is allowed and the settlement agreement dated 29.07.2024 is taken on record.
¶11The suit is decreed in terms of the settlement agreement dated
29.07.2024 executed between the parties. The registry is directed to draw up a final decree in terms of thereof. The settlement agreement dated
29.07.2024 along with annexures A to F thereto shall form part of decree. The site plan annexed at Annexure F of the settlement agreement, which in colour copy, shall form part of the decree in its coloured form.
¶12Pending applications stand disposed of.
¶13Interim orders, if any, stand vacated and all future dates are hereby cancelled.
¶14Learned counsel for the parties state that Mr. Amit Andley, learned Mediator had extensive meetings with the parties over a period of 10 months which played a crucial role in bringing about the settlement. The parties thus, express their gratitude to the learned Mediator for the constructive role played in bringing about the settlement.
¶15This Court takes on record the said statement of the parties and their counsels and record its appreciation for the learned Mediator's efforts in The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. bringing about the settlement.
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J NOVEMBER 19, 2024/mt/MG
Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 75/2023 & I.A. 1958/2023, I.A. 40689/2024 SHEIKH BADRUL ABIDIN & ANR. .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Jai Shah Endlaw, Mr. Zubin Manmen John, Ms. Sagarika Kaul, Advocates along Plaintiff in person versus MANZOOR UL ISLAM AND ORS .....Defendants Through: Mr. Varun S Ahuja, Ms. Ridhi Kapoor, Mr. Himanshu Sharma, Advocates for D-1 alongwith D-1 in person Mr. Vinod Sharma, Advocate along with D-10 in person Mr. M.F. Nizami, Advocate for D-2 to D-5. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.