- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 19 November 2024
- Bench
- Jasmeet Singh
- Case no.
- W.P.(CRL) 408/2024
Judgment
O R D E R %
19.11.2024
¶1This is a petition filed under Section 226 of the Constitution of India with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of Order dated 15.01.2024 passed by the Competent Authority, Tihar Prison, Delhi and directing the respondent to release the petitioner on 1st spell of furlough for a period of 21 days.
¶2The said impugned order dated 15.01.2024 is predicated on the fact that the petitioner had been awarded punishment on 07.09.2021 for recovery of prohibited article inside the jail and hence, the petitioner did not have 3 annual good conduct report as per paragraphs 1223(i) of the Delhi Prison Rules, 2018.
¶3In W.P.(CRL) 404/2024, I have already quashed the punishment This is a digitally signed order. ticket dated 07.09.2021, hence, the impugned order dated 15.01.2024 becomes infructuous.
¶4In addition, as per the status report dated 07.03.2024, there was no other punishment awarded to the petitioner. The appellant is in custody for about 12 years and seeks grant of furlough for establishing social ties and meet his grandmother who is supposed to be ill.
¶5For the said reasons, the petition is allowed and the petitioner is directed to be released on furlough for a period of three weeks from the date of his release, on furnishing one surety of Rs. 10,000/- each to the satisfaction of the concerned Jail Superintendent, subject to the following conditions:
i) During the period the petitioner remains out on furlough, he will remain at his residence and shall report to the SHO of the concerned Police Station on every Saturday at 12:00.
ii) The petitioner shall also provide to the concerned SHO with mobile telephone number which shall be kept in working condition at all times and shall not switch off or change the mobile number without prior intimation to the SHO concerned.
iv)The petitioner is directed to surrender before the jail authorities at the expiry of the period of furlough.
¶6The petition is disposed of in terms of the above. JASMEET SINGH, J NOVEMBER 19, 2024/NG Click here to check corrigendum, if any This is a digitally signed order.
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 408/2024 AMAN SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anup Kr. Das, Mr. Ashish Sareen, Advs. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC, Mr. Sangeet Sibou, Ms. Priya Rai, Mr. Anikate, Advs. ASI Mahesh Pratap, PS Janak Puri CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.