Prashant B. Tanjaral & Anr v. State

ORDER %

18.01.2012 Crl. MA 725/2012 (exemption^ Exemptionallowedsubjectto alljustexceptions. Crl. MC 193/2012 & Crl. MA 724/2012 Tliis is apetitionunderSection482 Cr.PC preferredby the petitioners for quashingofan FIRNo.418/2009underSections279/304AIPG and 3/181, 146/196of Motor VehicleAct registeredat Police StationHauz Klias, New Delhi. The petitioner no.l Prashant B. Tanjaral and petitioner no.2/coniplainantare presentin person.It is submittedby petitionerno.2 that the partieshave arrivedat asettlementbefore the PresidingOfficer,MACT, Saket Court, New Delhi. As per the terms ofsettlement,Rs.5 lac was to be paidby the petitionerno.l PrashantB. Tanjaralto the petitionerno.2 and other Lrs ofdeceased.Admittedly,Rs.4 lac has alreadybeenpaid by petitionerno.l to petitionerno.2 and the balanceofRs.l lac in cash has been paid to her by petitionerno.l, the receiptofwhich she acknowledges.She states that since the matterhas been compromised,she does not intendto pursuethe aforesaid FIR any fiuther. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the parties have arrived at a settlement, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the aforesaid FIR alive. Consequently, the petition is allowed and FIR No.4.18/2009 under Sections 279/304A IPG and 3/181, 146/196 of Motor. Vehicle Act registered at Police Station Hauz Khas, New Delhi and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed. The amount of Rs.^ lac lying depositedin the trial court can be released to petitionerno.2 herein by the concerned trial court. The petition stands disposed of in above terms. M.L. MEHTA,J JANUARY 18,2012 rd :}y ljy(,-^'"I $-30 + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl.M.A. 1265/2012 in CRL.M.C. 193/2012 PRASHANT B. TANJARAL & ANR Petitioner Through: Mr.Sushil Kaushik, Advocate. STATE CORAM: versus Respondent Through: Ms.Fizani Husain, APP. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA ORDER

31.01.2012 This applicationis filed for modification/correctionin the order of this court dated 18.1.2012. Heard. In the last line of the said order, it was recorded as "The amount of Rs. 1lac lyingdepositedin the trialcourtcan be releasedto petitionerNo.2 herein by the concernedTrial Court". It is clarifiedthat inplaceofpetitionerNo.2, the releaseofthesaid amount shall be made to petitionerNo. 1 PrashantB. Tanjaral.With this correction,the applicationis disposedof Order dasti. 9^ m.l.m|ehta,j JANUARY 31, 2012 akb

r $-43 » IN THE fflGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 193/2012 PRASHANTB. TANJARAL&ANR Petitioner Through: Mr. SatishAggarwala,Advocate versus STATE Respondent Through: Mr. M.N. Dudeja,APP for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MX. MEHTA