Indian Bank Officers Association Delhi v. Indian Bank

O R D E R %

24.08.2026 CM APPL. 57013/2026 (seeks withdrawal of the petition)

¶1Counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, states that the Petitioner Association is in continuous discussion with the Respondent Management and that some affirmative assurances have been given regarding removal of the shortcomings in the policy. He submits that there is, therefore, a possibility of resolution of the Petitioner's grievances administratively and, accordingly, he has instructions to withdraw the present petition and pursue the issue administratively.

¶2Counsel for the Respondent states that there are no shortcomings in the policy and that no positive assurances, as alleged in the application, have This is a digitally signed order. been given. Nonetheless, he submits that the Petitioner is always at liberty to approach the Respondent Management for redressal of its grievances.

¶3For the reasons stated in the application, and in view of the foregoing, the application is allowed and disposed of. W.P.(C) 2174/2026

¶4In light of the order passed in CM APPL. 57013/2026, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. SANJEEV NARULA, J AUGUST 24, 2026/ab This is a digitally signed order.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010055612026 + W.P.(C) 2174/2026 INDIAN BANK OFFICERS ASSOCIATION DELHI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Baniwal, Ms. Manisha, Advocates. versus INDIAN BANK .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Gautam, Mr. Anant Gautam, Ms. Likivi K. Jakhalu, Mr. Aman Gahlot, Advocates with Mr. Shahid Akhtar, Senior Manager Law. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA