VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2008 › High Court of Delhi

Vijitashva Khosla Engg(India) Limited

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
28 March 2008
Bench
Vipin Sanghiauthor
Case no.
CO.PET. 17/2008

Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI COMPANY JURISDICTION + % DATED 28.03.2008 In the matter of : The Companies Act, 1956 Scheme of Amalgamation of: Vijitashva Khosla Engg (India) Ltd. …Petitioner/Transferor Company No.1 Vijitashva Investments Ltd. ....Petitioner/Transferor Company No.2 Space Machinetorg (India) Pvt. Ltd. ...Petitioner/Transferor Company No.3 with K.G Khosla Enterprises Ltd. ...Petitioner/Transferee Company

Through : Mr. Mukesh Sukhija Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. R.D. Kashyap, Deputy R.O.C for Regional Director Ms. Manisha Tyagi, Counsel for the OL. VIPIN SANGHI, J. (ORAL)

¶1This is the joint petition under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation of Vijitashva Khosla Engg (India) Ltd.(Petitioner/Transferor company No.1), Vijitashva Investments Ltd. (Petitioner/Transferor Company No.2), Space Machinetorg (India) Pvt. Ltd.(Petitioner/Transferor Company No.3) with K.G Khosla Enterprises Ltd.(Petitioner/Transferee company).

¶2The Petitioner/Transferor company No.1 was incorporated on 6.05.1982. The Petitioner/Transferor company No.2 was incorporated on 25.03.1980. The Petitioner/Transferor company No.3 was incorporated on 6.09.1980. The Transferee company was incorporated on 23.02.1946.

¶3The registered offices of all the Petitioner companies are situated at 1/74, II Floor, W.H.S. Kirti Nagar, New Delhi-110015, thus, within the jurisdiction of this Court.

¶4The authorized share capital of the Petitioner/Transferor company No.1 is Rs.20 lacs divided into 20,000 equity shares of Rs.100/- each, while the issued, subscribed and paid up equity share capital of the Petitioner/Transferor company No.1 is Rs.8,15,000/- divided into 8,150 equity shares of Rs. 100/- each.

¶5The authorized share capital of the Petitioner/Transferor company No.2 is Rs.20 lacs divided into 2,00,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each, while the issued, subscribed and paid up equity share capital of the Petitioner/Transferor company No.2 is Rs.12,29,970/- divided into 1,22,997 equity shares of Rs. 10/- each.

¶6The authorized share capital of the Petitioner/Transferor company No.3 is Rs.10 lacs divided into 1,00,000 equity shares of Rs.10/- each, while the issued, subscribed and paid up equity share capital of the Petitioner/Transferor company No.3 is Rs.5 lacs divided into 50,000 equity shares of Rs. 10/- each.

¶7The authorized, issued, subscribed and paid up share capital of the Petitioner/Transferee company is Rs.5 lacs divided into 50,000 equity shares of Rs. 10/- each.

¶8The petitioner companies had filed Company Application (M) No. 169/2007 which was allowed by order dated 11.12.2007. By the aforesaid order, the requirement of conducting the statutory meetings of the equity shareholders, Secured and Unsecured Creditors of all the Petitioner companies, for the purpose of considering and, if thought fit, approving the said Scheme of Amalgamation was dispensed with.

¶9Vide order dated 16.01.2008, citations were directed to be published in "The Statesman" (English edition) and "Jansatta" (Hindi edition), in terms of Companies (Court) Rules, 1959. An affidavit dated

18.03.2008 has been filed by one Mr. Mukesh Sukhija, Advocate on behalf of the petitioner company about the publication of the citations in "The Statesman" (English edition) and "Jansatta" (Hindi edition), on

15.03.2008. The said publications containing the said citations were also produced along with the affidavit.

¶10Notices were issued to the OL and the Regional Director (Northern Region) vide order dated 16.01.2008. Pursuant to the notice issued to the OL, a report dated 15.03.2008 has been filed by the Official Liquidator. The Official Liquidator has stated that he sought information from the petitioner company vide its letter No.OL/TECH/AMAL/108/860 dated 11.02.2008, upon which the requisite information was furnished by the Petitioner Companies.

¶11The OL has stated that he has considered the accounts of Petitioner companies as on 31st March 2007. The OL in its report has stated that he has not received any complaint against the Scheme of Amalgamation from any person/parties interested in the scheme in any manner whatsoever, and on the basis of information submitted by the petitioner companies. Thus it is inferred that the affairs of the petitioner companies do not appear to have been conducted in a manner prejudicial to the interest of the members, creditors, or public and in accordance with the provisions of Section 394(1) of the Companies Act, 1956.

¶12The report has also been filed by Shri Dhan Raj, Regional Director(R.D.) (Northern Region) by an affidavit, dated 19.03.2008. The R.D. has stated that he has no objection to the scheme of amalgamation.

¶13There is no other legal impediment to sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation which is annexed to the petition. Consequently, sanction is hereby granted to the Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioner companies will comply with the statutory requirements in accordance with law. Certified copies of this order be filed with the Registrar of Companies within five weeks. It is also clarified that this order will not be construed as an order granting exemption from payment of stamp duty that is payable in accordance to law. Upon sanction becoming effective from the appointed date of amalgamation, that is 1st April 2007, the Transferor company stands dissolved without being wound up. The O.L. shall be paid expenses amounting to Rs.10,000/- within two weeks, to be deposited in the Common Pool Fund.

¶14The petition is disposed of in terms of the above order. VIPIN SANGHI March 28, 2008 JUDGE aj

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.