VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2026 › High Court of Delhi

M/S.Enarch Consultants Pvt Ltd v. Chief Engineer Employees State Insurance Corporation

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
18 August 2026
Bench
Sachin Dattaauthor
Case no.
OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 41/2024

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Sachin Datta

Judgment

O R D E R

¶1The present petition seeks enforcement of an arbitral award dated

19.08.2023. Admittedly, the entire award amount (inclusive of interest) stands deposited in these proceedings.

¶2Learned senior counsel for the decree holder seeks leave to withdraw the said amount. It is stated that upon withdrawal of the said amount, the decree shall stand satisfied.

¶3It further transpires during the course of hearing,that the petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the respondent already stands dismissed.

¶4On the previous date of hearing, this Court passed the following order:- "EX. APPL.(OS) 1000/2026 (filed on behalf of decree holder seeking This is a digitally signed order. release of the Arbitral Award amount along with interest)

¶1Learned counsel for the judgment debtor seeks some time to verify whether any SLP has been filed against the dismissal of the petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and / or the consequential appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

¶2List on 18.08.2026 in the category of 'supplementary matters'."

¶5Today, the learned counsel for the judgment debtor submits that he does not have any instructionsas regards whether any petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and/or any SLP was filed against the judgment/order dated 07.07.2026, whereby, the petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was dismissed.

¶6In the circumstances, the deposited amount is directed to be released to the decree holder.

¶7It is acceded that the same would fully satisfy the claim of the decree holder.

¶8The Registry is directed to release the requisite amount along with the accrued interest to the decree holder as expeditiously as possible.

¶9The petition is disposed of in the above terms.

SACHIN DATTA, J AUGUST 18, 2026/r

This is a digitally signed order.

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010075322024 + OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 41/2024 and EX. APPLs.(OS) 266/2024, 1000/2026 M/S.ENARCH CONSULTANTS PVT LTD .....Decree Holder Through: Mr. Sonal Kumar Singh, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Yashvardhan Singh Gohil, Advocate. versus CHIEF ENGINEER EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION .....Judgement Debtor Through: Mr. Siddharth, SC for ESIC along with Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Ms. Himanshi Girdhar and Mr. Deepanshu Grover, Advocates for ESIC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA % 18.08.2026

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.