- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 31 August 2026
- Bench
- Harish Vaidyanathan
- Case no.
- RC.REV. 64/2026
Judgment
O R D E R %
31.08.2026
¶1In view of Notification No. 85/G-4/Genl.-I/DHC dated
21.08.2026, whereby the matters fixed for 27.08.2026 were directed to be taken up on 31.08.2026, the present matter is taken up today.
¶2The present Petition filed under Section 25-B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, seeks the following reliefs:- "(i) Set-aside and quash the impugned order of Eviction Order Dt.
02.09.2025 passed by the Court of Ms. Mansi Malik, ACJ-ARC (North West), Rohini Courts, Delhi, in Eviction Petition No. RC/ARC/5337 of 2016, titled as "Shankar Lal Versus Anil Kumar Jha";
(ii) Dismiss the Eviction Petition No. RC/ARC/5337 of 2016, titled as "Shankar Lal Versus Anil Kumar Jha"; filed by the Respondents herein; This is a digitally signed order. (iii) Pass any such other or further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper on the facts and in the circumstances of the case in favour of the Petitioner and against the Respondents."
¶3Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner, after arguing for a considerable period of time, on instructions, submits that he is not pressing the present Petition and submits that the Petitioner will be vacating the subject premises on or before 31.03.2027.
¶4The Petitioner, who is present in person in Court, also undertakes to ensure that a payment of sum of Rs. 5,000/- will be made to the LR No. 1(a) of deceased Respondent No. 1, namely, Ms. Kamlesh, as rent from 01.03.2026 up till 31.03.2027. He submits that the said payment shall be directly transferred into the bank account of Ms. Kamlesh, the details whereof are as under:
Account Holder's Name : Ms. Kamlesh
Account No.
: 10525719560
Bank's Name
: State Bank of India
Branch Name:
: Keshav Puram, New Delhi
¶5The Petitioner further agrees that he will file an Affidavit of Undertaking setting out therein, the terms as agreed to, and as set out in the preceding paragraphs within a period of two (02) weeks from today, failing which he shall vacate the subject premises forthwith. He also submits that if there is any breach of the terms of the undertaking, he will be liable to such proceedings as are permissible under law, including initiation of contempt proceedings as against him under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
¶6The present Petition, along with pending Application(s), stands disposed of in the above terms.
HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. AUGUST 31, 2026/tk/va This is a digitally signed order.
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010075542026 + RC.REV. 64/2026, CM APPL. 13772/2026 (Ex.), CM APPL. 13773/2026 (Stay) & CM APPL. 13774/2026 (Delay of 10 days in Re-filing the petition) ANIL KUMAR JHA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. S.K. Bhaduri, Ms. Neetu Gupta and Ms. Harshita Jain, Advocates along with Petitioner in person. versus SHANKAR LAL (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Mishra, Advocate along with LR No. 1(a) of deceased Respondent No. 1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.