VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2011 › High Court of Delhi

Rahunath Yadav v. State & Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
28 November 2011
Bench
M.L. Mehtaauthor
Case no.
CRL.M.C. 122/2011

Judgment

ORDER

28.11.2011 This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No. 73312006, under Sections 420/468 IPC registered at P.S. Janak Puri on the complaint of the respondent No.2 on the ground of parties having arrived at an amicable settlement. Petitioner and the respondent Nos. 2 & 3 are present in person. They are identified by their counsel and the 1.0. Both the parties state that they have compromised the matter in terms of the settlement arrived at before the Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari and now, there is no , } 1-- Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. s-dispute left. The respondent No.2 and 3 state that they have entered into the settlement with the petitioner of their own free will and without any inducement or coercion. They further state that now, they are left with no grievance against the petitioner and have no objection if the FIR is quashed. In view of the foregoing, no useful purpose shall be served by continuing with the FIR. Accordingly, FIR No. 733/2006, under Sections 420/468 IPe registered at P.S. Janak Puri and all the consequential proceedings arising out of the same are quashed. Bail bonds of the petitioners are cancelled and their sureties are discharged. Parties shall be bound by the terms of settlement as recorded in Mediation proceedings. Petition stands disposed of. Order dasti. NOVEMBER 28,2011 akb 4 __ -' ! ,;j

Case details

Parties and counsel

:--..., * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 122/2011 RAHUNATHYADAV Through: versus STATE & ORS ..... Petitioner Petitioner in person with Mr. D.S.Kohli, Advocate. ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Fizani Husain, APP with 1.0. Respondents No.2 & 3 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.