Ajay Kumar v. Office of the District and Session Judge Hq & Anr

O R D E R %

13.11.2024

¶1Learned counsel for the respondent nos.1 and 2 submits that in the instant petition, the petitioner has been found to be entitled for actual promotion with effect from 10.06.2008, for the post of Junior Judicial Assistant, whereas, the date of notional promotion has been considered to be

24.04.2008.

¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner, who is appearing through video conferencing, contends that the petitioner confines his relief to the extent of directing the respondents to release the necessary financial benefits accruing from of the date of actual promotion i.e. 10.06.2008.

¶3The Court finds the aforesaid prayer to be reasonable, and, accordingly, directs the petitioner to file a fresh representation along with all This is a digitally signed order. necessary documents to the respondent nos. 1 and 2.

¶4On receiving of the aforesaid representation, let the same be decided by the respondents in accordance with law and all necessary benefits be extended to the petitioner, if found entitled.

¶5With the aforesaid observations, the petitioner stands disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to approach this Court, if need so arises.

PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J NOVEMBER 13, 2024 aks This is a digitally signed order.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2658/2024 AJAY KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Utkarsh Singh, Adv. (Thr. VC) versus OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE HQ & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, standing counsel with Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Laavanya Kaushik, Ms. Aliza Alam, Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV