VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2026 › High Court of Delhi

Sandhya Bhardwaj v. Union of India & Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
18 August 2026
Bench
Anil Kshetarpalauthor, Shail Jain
Case no.
W.P.(C) 342/2024

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Anil KshetarpalFollow Shail Jain

Judgment

O R D E R %

18.08.2026

¶1Through the present Writ Petition, the Petitioner seeks quashing of the Show Cause Notice dated 29th October, 2023, whereby the Petitioner was called upon to show cause as to why an order cancelling his Goods and Services Tax (hereinafter, "GST") Registration be not passed.

¶2It is an admitted position that an order cancelling the Petitioner's GST Registration was subsequently passed on 30th October, 2023. Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner's GST Registration had earlier also been cancelled; however, an application seeking revocation of the said cancellation was allowed on 27th September, 2023. He submits that, immediately thereafter, another Show Cause Notice dated 29th September, 2023, came to be issued.

¶3Learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent, on the other This is a digitally signed order. hand, submits that the competent authority was required to select the option for seeking certain clarifications from the Petitioner. However, inadvertently, the option for revocation of the Petitioner's GST Registration was selected, resulting in issuance of the impugned notice.

¶4This Court has further been informed that, upon inspection of the premises, the Petitioner's Firm was found to be non-existent.

¶5Against the order cancelling his GST Registration, two statutory remedies are available to Petitioner, namely, to seek revocation of the cancellation of the GST Registration or to prefer an appeal before the competent Appellate Authority.

¶6In view of the disputed questions of fact arising for consideration, this Court is not inclined to exercise its writ jurisdiction and accordingly, relegates the Petitioner to the aforesaid statutory remedies.

¶7In case the Petitioner files an application seeking revocation of the cancellation of his GST Registration or prefers an appeal, as the case may be, within a period of 15 days from today, the same shall be considered and decided on merits without being rejected on the ground of limitation.

¶8With the aforesaid observations, the present Writ Petition, along with pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.

SHAIL JAIN, J. AUGUST 18, 2026/PT/MM This is a digitally signed order.

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010089332024 + W.P.(C) 342/2024, CM APPL. 1552/2024 SANDHYA BHARDWAJ .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kanhaiya Singhal, Ms. RupamKumari, Mr. Udit Bakshi& Ms. Avantika Shankar, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anish Roy, SSC CBIC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAIL JAIN

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.