VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2026 › High Court of Delhi

Deepa Bhure & Ors v. Jai Kishan & Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
25 August 2026
Bench
Mini Pushkarnaauthor
Case no.
CONT.CAS(C) 450/2026

Judgment

MINI PUSHKARNA, J. (ORAL):

¶1The present petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the settlement arrived at between the parties vide Settlement Agreement dated 31st January, 2019, as incorporated in the judgment dated 15th February, 2019 passed by this Court in CS(OS) 3324/2014.

¶2Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the dispute qua property which has fallen in favour of the respondents in terms of paragraph H of the Settlement Agreement, viz., Plot No. 195, Sector 47, Huda Haryana, situated at Gurugram, Haryana, already stands settled, and

that a Sale Deed dated 06th August, 2026 has been executed by the petitioners in favour of the respondents.

¶3Learned counsel appearing for the respondents confirms the said fact.

¶4Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners draws the attention of this Court to the said Settlement Agreement to submit that the property as mentioned in paragraph A of the said Settlement Agreement has fallen to the share of the petitioners. Paragraph A is reproduced as under: "xxx xxx xxx

xxx xxx xxx"

¶5Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that property admeasuring 1900 sq. yards has now fallen in possession of the petitioners, out the total property admeasuring 5993.3 yards situated in Sangam Vihar, Delhi.

¶6Learned counsel appearing for the respondents confirms the said fact that the possession of the said portion in aforesaid property is with the petitioners. She further submits that the respondents are not interfering in the peaceful possession of the property of the petitioners, and shall not do so in future.

¶7At this stage, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has drawn the attention of this Court to the photographs attached with the present petition to submit that the boundary wall earlier sought to be constructed by the petitioners in the portion in the aforesaid property in Sangam Vihar,

Delhi, which is already in possession of the petitioners, was not allowed by the respondents, and disturbance was created therein. She further submits that the boundary wall was broken by the respondents.

¶8In response, learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the respondents have no objection if the boundary wall is constructed by the petitioners in the portion already under their possession in the Sangam Vihar property.

¶9Accordingly, it is directed that the respondents shall not create any hindrance in the construction of the boundary wall around the portion which is in possession of the petitioners in the said property.

¶10This Court also takes note of the submission made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners that the aforesaid property in Sangam Vihar was earlier an agricultural land and is now urbanized. She, thus, submits that mutation or transfer of the said property is not open at the moment. She submits that as and when mutation of the aforesaid property is allowed by the statutory authorities, the respondents ought to cooperate in transferring the mutation of the said portion in the property situated in Sangam Vihar in favour of the petitioners herein.

¶11Learned counsel appearing for the respondents assures this Court that as and when such need arises, the respondents shall duly cooperate with the petitioners in getting the said portion in the property situated in Sangam Vihar mutated in favour of the petitioners.

¶12The respondents are held bound by the aforesaid undertaking, and it is directed that they shall duly cooperate with the petitioners in getting the mutation of the said portion in the property in question in favour of the petitioners.

¶13No further orders are required to be passed in the present petition.

¶14The present petition is accordingly disposed of.

MINI PUSHKARNA, J AUGUST 25, 2026/KR

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 25th August, 2026 # CNR No. DLHC010105872026 + CONT.CAS(C) 450/2026 & CM APPL. 17385/2026 DEEPA BHURE & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Sunita Maan, Adv. M: 9999187238 versus JAI KISHAN & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Saroj Bala, Adv. for R-1 & 2 Mr. J.K. Tripathi, SPC with ASI Neeraj for Delhi Police CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.