- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 24 August 2026
- Bench
- Neena Bansal Krishna
- Case no.
- RFA 167/2024
Judgment
O R D E R %
24.08.2026 CM APPL. 57109/2026
¶1Application under Ordre XXIII Rule 3 read with Sections 107(2) and 151 of CPC has been filed on behalf of the Appellant in view of settlement between the parties.
¶2It is submitted that matter has been amicably settled between the Appellant (Defendant No.1) and Respondent No.1 (Plaintiff), though it is being continued against Respondent No.2 (Defendant No.2).
¶3Parties under that liability is joint and separately, despite which on account of NOC given by the Plaintiff, Appellant seeks permission to withdraw present Appeal.
¶4In view of the terms and conditions of the Settlement, incorporation in this Application, to which parties undertook to remain bound, Appeal is permitted to be withdrawn.
¶5Accordingly, Appeal along with pending Applications stands This is a digitally signed order. dismissed as withdrawn.
¶6Appellant is at liberty to seek return of the documents, in accordance with law.
¶7Next date of hearing, i.e. 03.02.2027, stands cancelled.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J. AUGUST 24, 2026/R This is a digitally signed order.
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010114032024 + RFA 167/2024 RAMESH GULABANI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Yash Srivastava, Ms. Urvi Syal and Ms. Diti Jain, Advs. versus LIC HOUSING FINANCE LTD. & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Jatin Chaudhary, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.