- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 7 November 2017
- Bench
- G.S.Sistani, V. Kameswar Rao
- Case no.
- W.P.(C) 498/2017
Judgment
O R D E R %
07.11.2017
The petitioners are licensed tehbazari holders of a site measuring 6 feet x 4 feet open to sky. Aggrieved by the order by which the allotment was cancelled, the petitioners approached this Court. During the pendency of this writ petition, an alternate site was provided to the petitioners. However, the petitioners had complained on account of seepage and an alternate site was not usable. A submission was made as recorded in the order of 20th January, 2017 that the original sites are not usable, habitable on account of leakage of water from booster pumps. The counsel for the MCD had undertaken to look into the matter. This Court was then informed that the seepage of water was from the side, which belongs to the Railways. Accordingly, Standing Counsel for Railways was requested to look into the matter. Today we are informed that the area in question has been repaired and is free from any seepage. Status reports have been filed by the MCD as also by the Railways. In view of the report filed, counsel for the petitioners does not press this petition. The same is dismissed as withdrawn.
G.S.SISTANI, J
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J NOVEMBER 07, 2017/ak
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 498/2017 IQRAR AHMED & ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. S.M. Tripathi, Adv. versus THE COMMISSIONER, NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Kapil Dutta, Adv. for North DMC Mr. Om Prakash, Adv. for Northern Railways CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.