Ayanna Yadav (Minor) and Anr v. Union of India and Ors

O R D E R %

11.11.2025

¶1Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

¶2We have been informed that the petitioner has already taken admission in some other law school. However, learned counsel for the petitioner states that certain issues have been raised in the petition which needs consideration by the consortium of the National Law Universities (herein referred to as 'NLUs').

¶3Accordingly, without making any observation as to the merit of the claim of the parties, we dispose of this writ petition with the liberty to the petitioner to approach the consortium of the NLUs at its given address as described in this petition by way of making a representation/application, taking all the pleas which may be available to the petitioner and enclosing therein all the documents on which he intends to rely on.

¶4In case, any such representation is made, the same shall be placed for This is a digitally signed order. consideration by the consortium of NLU before the appropriate authority and decision thereon shall also be taken which may be communicated to the petitioner as well.

¶5The writ petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J NOVEMBER 11, 2025 yrj

This is a digitally signed order.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3369/2025 AYANNA YADAV (MINOR) AND ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Manish Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr. Siddhant Jain and Mr. Manan Jain, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Arun Srikumar and Mr. Shubhansh Thakur, Advocates. Ms. Srishty Kaul and Ms. Roopsee Pandita, Advocates for IILM. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA