VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2024 › High Court of Delhi

Rohit Gupta & Anr v. Anand Divine Developers Private Limited & Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
7 November 2024
Bench
Sachin Dattaauthor
Case no.
OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 76/2022

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Sachin Datta

Judgment

O R D E R

¶1The parties have placed on record an Agreement to Sale and Purchase dated 28.10.2024 (hereinafter referred as "the agreement"), that has been executed pursuant to the settlement arrived at between the parties. A Memorandum of Understanding dated 28.10.2024 (hereinafter referred as "MoU") has also been executed between the Decree Holder and Judgment Debtors.

¶2Respective counsel for the decree holder and judgment debtors submit that the disputes between the parties stand resolved in terms of the Agreement and the MoU.

¶3Learned counsel for judgment debtors, on instructions, undertakes to abide with the terms of the MoU, particularly Clause – 7 thereof, which records as follows: This is a digitally signed order. "7. That it is the responsibility of the Second Party and the Third Party to ensure that the Buyer fulfils its obligations to pay the Total Sales consideration under the Agreement to Sell to the First Party (i.e. amount payable to the First Party as well as ICICI Bank towards loan closure) within 60 days of execution of the Agreement to Sell. In case of failure on the part of the Buyer to pay the Total Sales Consideration, the balance of the Buyer of the Total Sales Consideration shall be paid by the Second Party which shall be recoverable by the Confirming Parties from the Buyer."

¶4It is assured and undertaken that the requisite payments to the decree holder shall be made in terms of the MoU and if there is any default on the part of the judgment debtors in this regard, the same shall amount to breach of an unconditional undertaking to this Court, to be treated as egregious contempt of orders of this Court, warranting appropriate action under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, besides entailing other consequences in terms of the MoU.

¶5Taking on record the aforesaid undertaking, the present petition is disposed of.

SACHIN DATTA, J NOVEMBER 7, 2024/cl

This is a digitally signed order.

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 76/2022 and EX. APPL.(OS) 3338/2022 (for preponement of hearing) ROHIT GUPTA & ANR. .....Decree Holders Through: Mr. Amit Goel, Adv. versus ANAND DIVINE DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. .....Judgement Debtors Through: Mr. Kashish Bansal, Adv. (through v/c) Mr. Gautan Singhal, Adv. for ICICI Bank Ltd. (through v/c) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA % 07.11.2024

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.